State v. Racskowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Information for disobeying an order of the health officer of the borough of Naugatuck quarantining the defendant and her two minor children on account of their supposed infection with scarlatina or scarlet fever, brought to the District Court of Waterbury and tried to the jury before Peasley,verdict and judgment of guilty, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The case went to the jury upon the third count of the information, which charged the accused with having violated an order of the health officer of the borough of Naugatuck quarantining the accused and her two minor children as persons whom said health officer had reasonable grounds for believing to be infected with scarlatina or scarlet fever, a contagious disease, by herself breaking said quarantine and leaving said house, and allowing her two children to do the same.
The information assumed to charge the crime provided for by General Statutes, § 2552, for a violation of an order of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Seavey v. PrebleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
- Kirby v. HarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Whidden v. CheeverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
- Smith v. EmeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Appeal of PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- People ex rel. Barmore v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. HellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Town of Wallingford v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. BunnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.