Legal Opinion

Allemed, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 13, 1981No. 17147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

A tax question.

Or — to be more precise — several tax questions.

It’s a mixed bag — we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Allemed, Inc., is in the business of selling drugs, equipment, supplies, pharmaceuticals, and biologicals to veterinarians. Its headquarters are in Missouri; it has no office, place of business, or stock of goods in Illinois. Allemed has three salesmen who, together, spend approximately 10 man-days per month in Illinois. These salesmen work exclusively for Allemed and cover roughly defined territories. However, most customers place their orders by phone with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Scripto, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. General Trading Co. v. State Tax Commission of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Smith v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Exhibits, Inc. v. SweetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Falcone v. Taxation Div. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
  3. Estate of Graham v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Ridgewood Log Homes, Inc. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Exhibits, Inc. v. Sweet Opinion modifiedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API