Allemed, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
A tax question.
Or — to be more precise — several tax questions.
It’s a mixed bag — we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
Allemed, Inc., is in the business of selling drugs, equipment, supplies, pharmaceuticals, and biologicals to veterinarians. Its headquarters are in Missouri; it has no office, place of business, or stock of goods in Illinois. Allemed has three salesmen who, together, spend approximately 10 man-days per month in Illinois. These salesmen work exclusively for Allemed and cover roughly defined territories. However, most customers place their orders by phone with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scripto, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- General Trading Co. v. State Tax Commission of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smith v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Exhibits, Inc. v. SweetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Falcone v. Taxation Div. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
- Estate of Graham v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Ridgewood Log Homes, Inc. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Exhibits, Inc. v. Sweet Opinion modifiedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999