LePome v. Berkson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*552OPINION
By the Court,
Pickering, J.:
This appeal presents three narrow but previously undecided issues concerning offer of judgment practice under NRCP 68 and NRS 17.115. Reversing, we hold that (1) a judgment obtained on or after appeal can qualify as a “more favorable judgment” for purposes of the fee-shifting provisions of NRCP 68 and NRS 17.115, (2) appellate fees are recoverable, and (3) an unrepresented party who serves an offer of judgment may recover fees later paid to a lawyer hired to prosecute or defend the case.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The underlying dispute involves a contest…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Rosenaur v. SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- RTTC Communications, LLC v. Saratoga Flier, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Berkson v. LePomeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Berkson v. LePomeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- CAPRIATI CONSTR. CORP., INC. VS. YAHYAVI C/W 80821Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- CAPRIATI CONSTR. CORP., INC. VS. YAHYAVI C/W 80821Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- CARRINGTON MORTG. HOLDINGS, LLC VS. R VENTURES VIII, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.