Legal Opinion

LePome v. Berkson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. 51891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*552OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, J.:

This appeal presents three narrow but previously undecided issues concerning offer of judgment practice under NRCP 68 and NRS 17.115. Reversing, we hold that (1) a judgment obtained on or after appeal can qualify as a “more favorable judgment” for purposes of the fee-shifting provisions of NRCP 68 and NRS 17.115, (2) appellate fees are recoverable, and (3) an unrepresented party who serves an offer of judgment may recover fees later paid to a lawyer hired to prosecute or defend the case.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The underlying dispute involves a contest…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rosenaur v. SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. RTTC Communications, LLC v. Saratoga Flier, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Berkson v. LePomeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Berkson v. LePomeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. CAPRIATI CONSTR. CORP., INC. VS. YAHYAVI C/W 80821Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. CAPRIATI CONSTR. CORP., INC. VS. YAHYAVI C/W 80821Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. CARRINGTON MORTG. HOLDINGS, LLC VS. R VENTURES VIII, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API