Legal Opinion

Tackett v. Continental College of Beauty

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1975No. 11715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

Sammy E. Tackett (hereinafter claimant) has brought this appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission (hereinafter Commission) which denied his claim for unemployment insurance benefits. We reverse the order of the Commission.

*635Claimant’s usual occupation is that of a bookkeeper. He was hired by A. B. Parker to perform bookkeeping duties for several of Parker’s enterprises. Although he performed his duties in connection with the various enterprises, claimant was treated as an employee of one corporate entity, M & P Incorporated, doing business as Hollywood Beauty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. KARTRIDG-PAK CO. INC. v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Adams v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Qualman v. State, Dept. of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Qualman v. State, Dept. of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API