Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Ming

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1970No. 11722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice JOHN CONWAY HARRISON

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Plaintiffs, Charles II. Hutton and Annette Hutton, brought this action in the district court of the. eleventh judicial district, Lincoln county, to recover actual and punitive damages from the defendant, John J. Ming. The basis of the action was fraudulent misrepresentation and conversion. The jury returned a verdict against the defendant, John J. Ming, for actual and punitive damages. Defendant Ming appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict and from orders denying his motions for new trial and for judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Healy v. GinoffMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rugani v. LeonoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Hood v. ClineWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Foster v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. Kinjerski v. LameyMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wright v. BlevinsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Selvidge v. McBeenMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Selvidge v. McBeenMontana Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API