Legal Opinion

Rugani v. Leonoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1952No. Civ. 14797PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, J. pro tem.

This is a proceeding in which the contest of a will was consolidated for trial with an action to cancel two deeds. Two sets of findings were made by the trial court and two judgments entered. For the purpose of this appeal the findings will be considered as a single set, and the two judgments as but one. (People v. Ocean Shore R., Inc., 22 Cal.App.2d 657 [72 P.2d 167]; East Bay Mun. Utility Dist. v. Kiefer, 99 Cal.App. 240 [278 P. 476, 279 P. 178].)

The two children of the decedent, Rugani, filed the contest to his alleged will. Upon the trial they abandoned their other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Zins Ex Rel. Kelsch v. ZinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Estate of PellegriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Estate of Wenzel-Mosset Ex Rel. Gaukler v. NickelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Estate of WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Cullen v. SpremoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API