Legal Opinion

Dolinka VanNoord and Co. v. Oppenheimer and Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 16, 1995No. 1:94-cv-00710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

In this diversity action the certified public accounting firm of Dolinka VanNoord & Co. and its partners, as plaintiffs, have brought a claim for contribution against defendant Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”), a securities brokerage firm. The claim arises from a judgment entered by this court against plain tiffs’ predecessor, Dolinka Smith & Van-Noord (“DSV”), on a securities fraud claim filed by a pension plan and its trustees against both DSV and Oppenheimer. Presently before the court is defendant Oppenheimer’s motion to dismiss or, in the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moisenko v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
  2. Carlson v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  3. In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia on December 20District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  4. Bajorek v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. W.S.R v. FCA US LlcDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API