Legal Opinion
Flanigan v. Ditto, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 15, 1936No. 5588PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
The judgment from which Flanigan appeals was rendered on a verdict which, at the close of all the evidence, the court directed in favor of the Ditto corporation on all the counts of the declaration save count 6, as to which a verdict for Flanigan for one dollar was directed.
Flanigan was an inventor and builder of duplicating machines. For several years before 1910 he had worked with or for a certain concern known as Billograph Co. In 1910 he was granted a United States patent on a duplicating machine, and had pending an application for another patent for improvements…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Evans v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Booth v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hemmick v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
- Vance v. Chicago Portrait Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smoley v. New Jersey Zinc Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1938
- Cataphote Corporation v. Cecil W. Hudson and Hudson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Boop v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
- Berry v. Glidden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Flanigan v. Ditto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937