Legal Opinion
Cataphote Corporation v. Cecil W. Hudson and Hudson Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1971No. 30810_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
The second sojourn of this trade secret litigation in this court questions whether the district court properly complied with the mandate which ended its first visit. Determining that the overall substance of the district judge’s order comports with our previous opinion and that he did not abuse his discretion in denying injunctive relief, we affirm.
Plaintiff-appellant Cataphote Corporation, a manufacturer of microscopic glass beads, originally instituted the present case against Cecil W. Hudson and Hudson Industries, Incorporated, to enjoin them from using certain alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Frierson v. Sheppard Building Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Cataphote Corporation v. Cecil W. Hudson and Hudson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Smoley v. New Jersey Zinc Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1938
- Smoley v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rice Researchers, Inc. v. HiterMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Forest Laboratories, Inc., (Cross Appellant) v. The Pillsbury Company, (Cross Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- W.C. Phillips and Mary Phillips, D/B/A Ambusher, Inc. v. Claude Frey, Jr., Claude Frey, Jr., Gary Arnold, and Buck-Pro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ark-Ell Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.