State v. Bulkowski, 13-06-29 (6-25-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Daniel E. Bulkowski, appeals the judgment of the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas, resentencing him to consecutive prison terms. On appeal, Bulkowski asserts that the trial court deprived him of a liberty interest without due process of law; that the trial court violated the ex post facto clause in resentencing him; and, that the trial court committed plain error in resentencing him. Finding that the trial court did not deprive Bulkowski of a liberty interest without due process of law, did not violate the ex post facto clause, and did not commit plain…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Land, 2-07-20 (12-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Kindle, 5-07-11 (12-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007