Legal Opinion
State v. Kindle, 5-07-11 (12-3-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 2007No. 5-07-11PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Kenneth Kindle, appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas, convicting him and sentencing him to a non-minimum prison term. On appeal, Kindle asserts that the trial court erred by imposing a non-minimum sentence in violation of the due process and ex post facto clauses; that the trial court committed plain error by imposing a non-minimum sentence; and, that the trial court did not have the authority to impose a non-minimum sentence. Based on the following, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} In December 2006, the Hancock…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Land, 2-07-20 (12-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Lester, 2-07-34 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Moore, 5-07-18 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. McCoy, 07ap-955 (5-22-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008