Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Kay
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 10, 2009No. Civil Action 09 0255Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and will dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff alleges that, after charges against him were dismissed by the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia on February 17, 2005, he was detained at the D.C. Jail “for a period of 72 hours so that the State of Maryland could obtain custody of Plaintiff’ pursuant to an outstanding warrant. Compl. at 3. He further alleges that, during…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.