Legal Opinion

St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Gilliam

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hardeman County; J. A. Nabers, Judge. Action by Gilliam & Jackson against the St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The appellee instituted this suit in the district court of Hardeman county, Tex., against appellants for damages to a shipment of cattle made by appellee over appellants’ line of road about March 23, 1912, from Quanah, Tex., to Kansas City, Mo. By original petition, appellees sought to recover on account of the negligence of appellant in delaying the cattle and by reason of rough and careless handling, causing shrinkage, and alleged a decline in the market. Appellant filed a general denial and specially pleaded the fifth paragraph of the written contract of shipment, which paragraph provides…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hume Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Breneman v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alamo Iron Works v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Armstrong v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Harris Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Armstrong v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API