Armstrong v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellees have filed a very forceful motion for rehearing setting up twenty different grounds of alleged error. We consider them without merit except the one complaining of our failure to charge Armstrong with interest upon the funds which we found he illegally held.
In that respect we were in error and our former judgment is hereby modified so as to add to the recovery of appellees, against Armstrong, interest, at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum on the sum of $496.68, from the dates upon which the several items were converted by him as shown by the judgment. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. BottsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914