Legal Opinion

Bank of Centerville v. Gelhaus

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1932No. File No. 7140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

At the time of the service of the summons and complaint on the defendant in this action, a garnishee summons was served on the garnishee. At the time of the service of the garnishee summons, the garnishee had in its possession a promissory note for $2,260, executed by one Jensen and wife, and a real estate mortgage securing the payment of the said note, payable to defendant. This note and mortgage had been regularly assigned by the defendant to the garnishee as collateral security for the payment of $500 which the defendant then owed to the garnishee. Shortly after the service of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. La Crosse National Bank v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gow v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Robinson v. TevisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Burnham v. DoolittleNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. McCown v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First Potter County Bank v. Hogg (In Re Hogg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1983
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Egland v. NeillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Murphy v. HopkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Egland v. NeillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API