Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Salem Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
189 N.J. Super. 50 (1983)
458 A.2d 1290
ROBERT JOHNSON, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SALEM CORPORATION, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 23, 1983.
Decided March 14, 1983.
Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.
Robert F. Colquhoun argued the cause for appellants (Colquhoun & Colquhoun, attorneys).
Alan Y. Medvin argued the cause for respondent (Horowitz, Bross, Sinins, Imperial and Medvin, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.
This is a products liability case arising out of an industrial accident in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Roman v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Salem Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Homann v. TorchinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Delaware Transit Corp. v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 842Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Burdzy v. CooneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Jurado v. Western Gear Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.