Legal Opinion
Bowden v. Grindle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 30, 1996No. Law Docket HAN-95-270PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Edward B. Grindle and Prudence E. Grin-dle appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Mead, J.) in favor of Ruth D. Bowden on her complaint seeking rescission of a deed given to the Grindles and on the amount awarded to the Grindles on their counterclaim based on unjust enrichment. The Grindles contend that the court erred in concluding that Bowden’s mental illness was sufficient to toll the statute of limitations, in finding that Bowden lacked the requisite competence to convey the property, and in its computation of the damages awarded to them on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McAfee v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Bowden v. GrindleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ProiaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Williams v. UbaldoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Douglas v. York CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Guardianship of HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- In Re Estate of MarquisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Bonina v. SheppardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.