Legal Opinion

Amie Drammeh v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2024No. 22-36038Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMIE DRAMMEH; YUSUPHA No. 22-36038 CEESAY, Individually and as surviving parents of Cherno Ceesay; D.C. No. MARAM CEESAY, Personal 2:21-cv-00202- Representative of the estate of Cherno BJR Ceesay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER v. CERTIFYING QUESTION TO UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a THE SUPREME Delaware corporation; RASIER, LLC; COURT OF DOES, 1-100, inclusive, WASHINGTON Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nivens v. CornerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McKown v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lauritzen v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API