C. & E. Marshall Co. v. Leon
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff brought suit to recover an indebtedness of $70 for goods and merchandise sold by it to the defendant. It also filed an affidavit for an attachment in aid, in which J. M. Braude and Emanuel Maltz Company were made garnishees. After a hearing the court quashed the writ in attachment and discharged the garnishees but entered judgment against the defendant on plaintiff’s claim for $70. Plaintiff, by this writ of error, questions the holding of the court in the'attachment suit.
The grounds for the attachment as stated in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murry Nelson & Co. v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Weare Commission Co. v. DruleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Palo Savings Bank v. CameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Ritter v. WraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- United Paper & Trading Co. ex rel. Parodi, Erminio & Co. v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brady v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- In Re Gill-Owen Co. Hillsboro Nat. Bank v. BuscherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Cain v. PrattMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Wikelund Wholesale Co. v. Tile World Factory Tile WarehouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978