Legal Opinion
In re Sargeant
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 10, 2017No. 17mc374PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Harry Sargeant III (“Sargeant”) brings this application ex parte1 under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for an order granting him , leave to serve a subpoena on Burford Capital, LLC (“Burford”) to produce documents for use in a Panamanian attachment proceeding. In addition, Sargeant claims that the requested discovery will inform him of his rights with respect to a pending lawsuit in the United Kingdom that he contemplates joining, as well as his rights with respect to potential lawsuits in the United Kingdom and the Isle of Mari that he contemplates…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. TyrrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Carlton Masters for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign ProceedingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In re Del Valle RuizDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- D'Anzieri v. HHarrison Global LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Ex Parte Application of Carlton MastersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- In Re: Application for an Order Permitting Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.