Olson v. Berg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Lac qui Parle county to recover $6,000 for malicious prosecution. The case was tried before Qvale, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $500. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for damages for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The only assignments of error which we are permitted to consider are with reference to certain rulings of the trial court on the admission of evidence. Some of the assignments which go to the alleged errors in the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury in certain respects are not founded on any exceptions taken at the trial, and were not specified as errors in the notice of motion for a new trial. These cannot, therefore, be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cappis v. WiedemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baier v. BaierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Conan v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Murray v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.