Cappis v. Wiedemann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an orider of the district court for Clay county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Action upon an account stated for work and' labor performed for defendant by plaintiff and members of his family. Defendant pleaded a settlement, and payment of the amount agreed upon. The case was tried to a court and jury. At the close of the evidence defendant requested an instructed verdict in her favor. This was denied. Plaintiff had a verdict. Defendant moved for judgment, or a new trial in the alternative., This appeal is from an order denying a new trial.
Several assignments of error question the rulings of the court below upon the admission of evidence and to the charge of the court.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinney v. HarvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Cogan v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Burke v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Smith v. Kingman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Conan v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Nye v. KahlowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Petruschke v. KamererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Northern Drug Co. v. AbbettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.