Karilyn Bonomolo-Hagen, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Clay Central-Everly Community School District, David Holmquist, Defendant-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
The District Court, applying precedent from the Northern District of Iowa, and observing that our Court had not yet definitively resolved the question, held that as the plaintiffs supervisor defendant David Holmquist could be held individually hable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accordingly, the District Court denied Holmquist’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Title VII claims against him, but certified the question pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), thus permitting Holmquist to seek an interlocutory appeal.
Holmquist’s petition for permission to appeal is granted, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alfreda Spencer v. Ripley County State Bank Ronald D. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Lenhardt v. Basic Institute of Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by68 opinions
- McCullough v. University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Archie D. Roark v. City of Hazen, Arkansas George Orlicek, MayorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Chatman v. Gentle Dental Center of WalthamDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Bunda v. PotterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Smith v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.