Legal Opinion
Lenhardt v. Basic Institute of Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1995No. 94-3149PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether James A. Zoeller is an employer within the meaning of the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). The MHRA imposes liability only on employers for proscribed acts of discrimination in the workplace. The District Court1 held that Zoeller was not an employer and granted his motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Peter Len-hardt III, timely filed his notice of appeal with the District Court. As a result of Len-hardt’s subsequent death, Elizabeth J. Len-hardt has been substituted as the appellant in this ease in her…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Grant v. Lone Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Sauers v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Karilyn Bonomolo-Hagen, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Clay Central-Everly Community School District, David Holmquist, Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Cabinet for Families & Children v. CummingsKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Cooper v. Albacore Holdings, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.