Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Lavelle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-586, 74-1442PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Before me are motions of various defendants to dismiss, and plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce,” in Civil Actions Nos. 74-586 and 74-1442. A history of these cases is set forth in an earlier opinion, Meyer v. Lavelle, 64 F.R.D. 533 (E.D. Pa.1974), and therefore only a brief summary of the background of these cases will be recited.
Paul Meyer, the pro se plaintiff, is a plumbing contractor who defaulted on a contract in 1972. Wisconsin Surety Corporation (Wisconsin Surety), which had bonded Meyer’s performance, completed the contract and then sued Meyer in the Court of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. Indiana HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Johnson v. County of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Harley v. OliverDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
- Meyer v. CurranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Alston v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM STEEL CORP., DIV., ETC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.