Legal Opinion

Holtan v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1944No. 33,754PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

On September 20, 1913, one Amil Fischer, a resident of Goodhue county, died intestate. He left surviving him his widow, defendant Anna Fischer, then 13 years of age and now 71, and two children, defendants Arthur Fischer, then 16 years of age, and Clara Summer-field, then 11 years of age, who were his sole and only heirs at law. Defendant Herman Summerfield is the husband of Clara.

At the time of his death, Amil was the owner of a 150-acre farm, 70 acres of which constituted the homestead. On the farm were farm animals and machinery. He also was the owner of cash in banks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Granger v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Vail v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Glencoe Ditching Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Cooper v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardenbergh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Raidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Anderson v. Educational Publishers, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API