Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Best v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 29, 1988No. A-1801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

Paul H. Best and the other appellants were arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI), AMC 9.28.020. They all consented to a chemical test of their breath to measure its alcohol content. An Intoximeter 3000 breath-testing machine yielded results indicative of intoxication in each case. The breath samples in each case were captured in a magnesium perchlorate tube (MPT), in an effort to comply with our decision in Anchorage v. Serrano, 649 P.2d 256 (Alaska App.1982) (prosecuting authorities must provide accused drunk drivers with means of verifying chemical tests of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  2. Selig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  3. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API