Legal Opinion

Friends of Animals v. Pritzker

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-1540Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 16-cv-1540 (DLF) 1 WILBER ROSS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Commerce, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The National Marine Fisheries Service (the Service) determined in 2014 that the queen conch, a marine mollusk that inhabits the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, did not warrant listing as an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plaintiffs, Friends of Animals (Friends) and WildEarth Guardians (WildEarth),…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API