Legal Opinion
Lovelace v. Whitney
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 3, 1988No. 84 C 2788PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Pro se plaintiff Eldridge Lovelace brings this action against former Assistant United States Attorney Scott Turow 1 and two other private attorneys, Bernard Whitney and William H. Hall. Turow has filed a motion to dismiss on the basis of absolute immunity. Hall has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or for judgment on the pleadings, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Whitney has moved for judgment on the pleadings, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). 2
Facts 3
Lovelace was indicted on April 2, 1980, on five…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stephen Buckley, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J. Michael Fitzsimmons, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Lerch v. BoyerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- LaBoy v. ZuleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Purk v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.