Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Davidson, 0. C. J.
This case, ‘of novel impression, and involving no disputed questions of fact, was, by stipulation, tried by the court without a jury.
Plaintiff seeks to recover the face amount of a policy of insurance issued to Frank Caruso, his son, on June 18th, 1942, in which policy he was named as beneficiary. Insured, while serving as a soldier in the United States Army, was killed by enemy action on March 26th, 1945, in the Battle of the Bulge during an advance in Brey, Germany.
The policy contained a War and Aviation Kisk Exclusion Provision, the pertinent clauses of which read as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Kupfersmith v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Bullowa v. Thermoid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Life Casualty Insurance Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Hayes v. Home Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Mancuso v. RothenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Janco v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.