Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. UNION STOCKYARDS CO. OF OMAHA, LIMITED
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1928No. 7944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
The parties will be designated as in the court below, namely plaintiff and defendant.
The defendant is a stockyards owner and subject to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act 1921 (7 USCA c. 9). On October 20, 1921, the defendant published and filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, as required by the act, schedules showing- its rates and charges for stockyard services rendered at its stockyards in Omaha, Neb., which thereupon became and were the only charges which it could lawfully collect during the time that such schedules remained unchanged.
Its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States Nav. Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Kelly v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co. Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue v. John R. Shuman and Sara G. ShumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re New York, N. H. & H. R.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.