Legal Opinion
Bautista v. Bautista
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided November 3, 1999No. 04-99-00285-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
The issue in this restricted appeal is whether the record affirmatively demonstrates strict compliance with the rules regarding citation and service of process. Because the record does not demonstrate strict compliance, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
On July 13, 1998, Melissa filed two motions for substituted service of process. In the affidavit accompanying her first motion, Melissa stated that personal service was attempted on two occasions at Andres’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barker CATV Construction, Inc. v. Ampro, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. Futrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Seib v. Bekker, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
- Stankiewicz v. OcaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Pao v. Brays Village East Homeowners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frazier v. Dikovitsky, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Laas v. Williamson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Guadalupe P. Perez v. Old West Capital Co., Assignee of Hudson & Keyse, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
- David Laas v. Betty Williamson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Dennis Frazier v. Mike Dikovitsky, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.