Legal Opinion

Clendenen v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1942No. 29133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The decision in this case hinges upon whether the agreement entered into on April 22, 1940,. barred the further application of Section 1465-86, G-eneral Code, which at all times in question provided that “the powers and jurisdiction of the board over each case shall be continuing, and it may from time to time make such modification or change with respect to former findings or orders with respect thereto, as, in its opinion may be justified.”

The decision in this case should be the same as that in State, ex rel. Weinberger, v. Industrial Commission, supra, unless a different result should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kittle v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cramer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Oberlin v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. Parks v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (10-19-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Michaels v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API