Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armer v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1995No. CACR 94-1177Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

The point raised in this appeal is actually a new point even though on the surface it may not appear to be new. The question presented is linked to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-97-101 (Supp. 1993) which provides for a bifurcated trial procedure in jury trials on felony charges. In summary, as pertains to this appeal, this statute provides that after the jury has found a defendant guilty, it shall then hear additional evidence, if any, relevant to sentencing, and then retire and determine the sentence; however, with the agreement of the prosecution and consent of the court the defendant may waive jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. People v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API