Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1994No. CR 94-470PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Desoto Williams was charged with four felonies alleged to have occurred in 1993. On January 10, 1994, Williams was convicted by jury on all four counts. On appeal, Williams’s sole argument is that, in sentencing him, the trial court erroneously employed Arkansas’s new bifurcated sentencing laws, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-4-103 (Repl. 1993) and 16-97-103 (Supp. 1993). Both of these statutes became effective January 1, 1994. Williams argues that, instead of using these new amendatory statutes, the trial court should have applied the sentencing laws that were in effect in 1993 —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ruiz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Cogburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Diffee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API