Legal Opinion
Denham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 15, 1976No. Civ. 75-0504-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
In this case the Plaintiff sues the Defendant for damages as a result of their rela tionship as a user (Plaintiff) of telephone service and a supplier (Defendant) of telephone service. The Plaintiff owns the Alamo Plaza Motel (Alamo) of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and was personally responsible for its business telephone account with Defendant for telephone service at the Motel. Plaintiff also has a business telephone at his optometrist office and a residence telephone, both in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
The evidence reveals that the Alamo bill in February,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steiger v. Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Moore v. Metropolitan Utilities CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Teleco, Inc., a Corporation v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Teleco, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Belco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984
- Itt Industrial Credit Co. v. L-P Gas Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Modern Equipment Corp. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977