Barr v. Barr
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
LOWE, Judge.
There is a suggestion in the record of this appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County that neither the appellant (cross-appellee), Rosalie M. Barr, nor the appellee (cross-appellant), Nathaniel F. Barr, are easily satisifed. Despite the duration of their marriage for over quarter-of-a century during which three daughters were born neither was satisfied by the union; now that it is terminated, neither is satisfied by its dissolution. Appellant wife complains that she did not get enough, arguing that:
“I. The court committed reversible error by refusing to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Kremelberg v. KremelbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Reuter v. ReuterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Aronson v. AronsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.