Legal Opinion

Barr v. Barr

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1984No. 978, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWE, Judge.

There is a suggestion in the record of this appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County that neither the appellant (cross-appellee), Rosalie M. Barr, nor the appellee (cross-appellant), Nathaniel F. Barr, are easily satisifed. Despite the duration of their marriage for over quarter-of-a century during which three daughters were born neither was satisfied by the union; now that it is terminated, neither is satisfied by its dissolution. Appellant wife complains that she did not get enough, arguing that:

“I. The court committed reversible error by refusing to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kremelberg v. KremelbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Reuter v. ReuterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Aronson v. AronsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API