Legal Opinion
Cureton v. Nielsen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–0576 (RJL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, Katherine Cureton ("Cureton" or "plaintiff"), proceeding pro se , brought this action against defendants, Kirstjen Nielsen, Rhonda Brooks, Tammy Hudson, and Allen Blume (collectively referred to as "defendants"), alleging various instances of discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Defendants moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Upon review of the pleadings, the relevant case law, and the entire record herein, defendants' motion is GRANTED and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cureton v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018