In Re the Meretricious Relationship of Sutton
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.
In In re Marriage of Lindsey, 101 Wn.2d 299, 302, 304, 678 P.2d 328 (1984), this state abandoned the presumption that all property acquired by a man and woman not married to each other but living together was not community property. We replaced that presumption with a rule "that courts must 'examine the [meretricious] relationship and the property accumulations and make a just and equitable disposition of the property.’ ” Id. at 304 (quoting Latham v. Hennessey, 87 Wn.2d 550, 554, 554 P.2d 1057 (1976)). In this case we are asked to decide whether the trial court’s conclusion that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Latham v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Marriage of PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Soltero v. WimerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soltero v. WimerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Finch v. WiederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.