Legal Opinion
Dailey v. National Hockey League
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 18, 1993No. 92-5156PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
This is a permitted interlocutory appeal by defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from an order of the district court denying their motion to dismiss. The district court granted defendants’ motion to certify the following question:
Does the assertion by the plaintiff of a claim under ERISA over which there is exclusive jurisdiction in federal court preclude dismissal under the doctrine of forum non conveniens and likewise preclude dismissal based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson, 305 U.S. 456,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Al-Abood v. El-ShamariCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc., Friends of the Earth in No. 93-5721 v. Hercules, Inc. In No. 93-5720Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bartnicki v. VopperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America v. AngoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- International Association of Entrepreneurs of America v. AngoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.