Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1936No. Civ. 10629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

Petitioners seek by mandamus proceedings to compel the respondent court to set aside an order dismissing appeals and to proceed with trials de novo in said court.

It appears from the petition for writ of mandate that on April 30, 1935, at a time when there was pending in the Justice’s Court of Santa Monica Township an action entitled Jack L. Horn, Plaintiff, v. Anna K. Beardsley, Defendant, the plaintiff therein caused an attachment to be levied upon certain personal property then in possession of the defendant; that petitioners filed a third party claim to said property, petitioner Chickenoff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spiegelman v. BowlusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Misrach v. LiedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Sherwood v. CornfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wilson v. DunbarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API