Legal Opinion
Williams v. Glickman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 21, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1149 (TAF)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Judgment, in Part, on the Pleadings. Having considered the arguments and authorities presented in the briefs filed by the parties and the argument of counsel at the March 8, 1996 hearing, the Court grants the defendant’s motion for the reasons that follow.
1. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs, former applicants for federal farm loans or assistance with farm loans, brought this civil rights action against Daniel R. Glickman, the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (the “Secretary”), in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kenneth W. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert C. HUGHES, Jr.; Daniel C. Lanford, Jr., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Brian E. Davis v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Prince v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J v. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Halim v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.