Legal Opinion
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1966No. 66 Civ. 1265PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
TYLER, District Judge.
This is an action brought by a New York resident, Morton Eisen, charging the two major “odd-lot” dealers on the New York Stock Exchange — defendants Carlisle & Jacquelin and DeCoppet & Doremus — with conspiring and combining to monopolize odd-lot trading and with charging excessive fees in violation of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. 1 and 2. The complaint also pleads a third claim or cause of action against the New York Stock Exchange (“Exchange”) upon the theory that the Exchange breached its duties prescribed by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for suspension of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.