Pepper v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor
This Court has long recognized that sentencing judges “exercise a wide discretion” in the types of evidence they may consider when imposing sentence and that “[h]ighly relevant — if not essential — to [the] selection of an appropriate sentence is the possession of the fullest information possible concerning the defendant’s life and characteristics.” Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241, 246-247 (1949). Congress codified this principle at 18 U. S. C. §3661, which provides that “[n]o limitation shall be placed on the information” a sentencing court may consider “concerning the [defendant’s]…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.