Legal Opinion
Fenwick-Schafer v. Sterling Homes Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 1, 1991No. Civ. A. R-90-1376PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAMSEY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above-captioned case is the motion for summary judgment of defendants Sterling Homes Corporation and Sterling Properties Associates V, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”). The motion has been fully briefed by the parties, and is ripe for consideration. Pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, the Court shall rule without a hearing.
I. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serves the important purpose of “conserv[ing] judicial time and energy by avoiding unnecessary trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Girardeau A. Spann v. Colonial Village, Inc. Girardeau A. Spann v. Marvin J. GerstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Blomgren v. OgleDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1993
- Ragin v. Harry MacKlowe Real Estate Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992