People ex rel. Dennison v. Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus to compel the court below to vacate an order for a new trial in ejectment. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This is an order to show cause why a mandamus ought not to issue, and the application is opposed on the ground that as the facts appear it is inexpedient to grant it. The application shows the following circumstances: September, 1873, relator commenced ejectment against Thomas Kelley in the circuit court for the county of Bay to recover certain premises in Bay City. Kelley appeared by Holmes, Haynes & Stoddard as his attorneys and pleaded the general issue, and at some time thereafter the action was transferred to the circuit court for the county of Genesee. Subsequently there was a trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dygert v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Chautauqua County Bank v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Brewster v. Van NessNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- People ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Kellogg v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Keyser v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Haseltine v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. EnloeTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Clairview Park Improvement Co. of Gross Pointe, Ltd. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912