Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. County of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 25, 2013No. 1:07-cv-01145-SMSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION
SANDRA M. SNYDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs are deputy sheriffs with the Fresno County Sheriffs Department. They pursue this collective action against the County of Fresno under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (2012) (FLSA), alleging that they were not compensated for overtime required of them by the County. On August 3, 2011, the Court granted summary judgment for Defendant on the claims relating to donning and doffing; commute time; vehicle maintenance; and meal breaks. Doc. 156. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Billy H. Forrester v. Roth's I. G. A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Stephen R. Newton v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Rai v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Barajas v. Blue Diamond Growers IncDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024