Legal Opinion

United States v. Bershchansky

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 19, 2013No. 12-CR-00064 (KAM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MATSUMOTO, District Judge.

Pending before the court is Defendant Yuri Bershchansky’s (“defendant,” or “Mr. Bershchansky”) motion to suppress (i) evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant executed on January 31, 2011, and (ii) statements made by the defendant on January 31, 2011, during the execution of the search warrant. Mr. Bershchansky is charged with possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(2). (ECF. No. 7, Indictment, filed 1/20/2012.) For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion to suppress evidence…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. FamilettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Youngs v. FusaroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Robert Letoile, Jr.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  5. United States v. FauxDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API