Youngs v. Fusaro
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff Sean N. Youngs claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, that Defendants, members of the City of Norwich Police Department, deprived him of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment *202rights by conducting a warrantless search of his business and by revoking his vendor’s permit for his hot dog cart without due process, Defendants move for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the merits or, alternatively, on the ground of qualified immunity. This Ruling resolves the summary judgment motion.
I
The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liu v. TangneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Savvidis v. McQuaidDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Savvidis v. McQuaidDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Shand v. ParsonsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Ward v. North StoningtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023