Legal Opinion

Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1938No. 8623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

This is a rule 37 case. Appeal is from a judgment of the trial court refusing to set aside a permit granted by the Commission to S. A. Adams on June 29, 1936, as an exception to rule 37, to drill a well on a strip of land in the East Texas oil field 105 feet wide and 825 feet long, containing 2.00416 acres. The order granting the permit recited that it was to prevent confiscation of property.

The material facts are as follows: In May, 1930, J. H. Alexander, fee owner, leased to B. A. Skipper a 50-acre tract, 827 feet wide east and. west, and 2639 feet long north and south. Early…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Stewart v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Railroad Commission v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API